[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Polling for new WG I-Ds
- To: "Drake, John E" <John.E.Drake2@boeing.com>, "Bryskin, Igor" <ibryskin@movaz.com>, "Diego Caviglia" <Diego.Caviglia@marconi.com>, "Dimitri.Papadimitriou" <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be>
- Subject: RE: Polling for new WG I-Ds
- From: "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:42:43 -0500
- Cc: "\" ccamp \" <ccamp" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, "\" owner-ccamp \" <owner-ccamp" <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, "Adrian Farrel <adrian" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "danli" <danli@huawei.com>
- In-reply-to: <626FC7C6A97381468FB872072AB5DDC8C2DCF8@XCH-SW-42.sw.nos.boeing.com>
Agree with John, and control plane failures don't (should not/hope not)
impact the data plane state. And before doing such a sw upgrade, I would
not want to have to move hundreds/thousands of LSPs from CP->MP.
I'm not sure myself on what is meant by CP->MP, need to discuss more.
(chair hat off)
Deborah
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Drake, John E
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:13 AM
To: Bryskin, Igor; Diego Caviglia; Dimitri.Papadimitriou
Cc: " ccamp " <ccamp; " owner-ccamp " <owner-ccamp; Adrian Farrel
<adrian; danli
Subject: RE: Polling for new WG I-Ds
Snipped
>
> Besides I can see at least one quite real application for
> CP->MP. Imagine that an operator wants to perform some major
> software upgrade with a new software version significantly
> incompatible with the previous one.
JD: Except that we go to great pains to ensure that this situation
never occurs.