[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed response to OIF on OSPF ENNI

To: "Jonathan Sadler" <jonathan.sadler@tellabs.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed response to OIF on OSPF ENNI
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:39:30 +0100
Cc: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
References: <626FC7C6A97381468FB872072AB5DDC8C2DC25@XCH-SW-42.sw.nos.boeing.com>
Reply-to: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>

Jon,

You said...

It should also be noted that the OIF has been
interested in setting up a formal OIF-IETF liaison
relationship to remove this misconception, while
CCAMP has prevented it.


You are now very close to the line.

Please restrain yourself from making disruptive and untrue statements on theCCAMP mailing list.


Thank you.

Adrian

Follow-Ups:
- An IETF / OIF liaison relationship Was: (Re: Proposed response to OIF on OSPF ENNI)
  - From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>

References:
- RE: Proposed response to OIF on OSPF ENNI
  - From: "Drake, John E" <John.E.Drake2@boeing.com>

Prev by Date: Statements about liaison relationship with ITU-T SG15
Next by Date: Addressing draft [Was: Proposed response to OIF on OSPF ENNI]
Previous by thread: RE: Proposed response to OIF on OSPF ENNI
Next by thread: An IETF / OIF liaison relationship Was: (Re: Proposed response to OIF on OSPF ENNI)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread