Re: Revision 02 of draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs

[dimitri papadimitriou <dpapadimitriou@psg.com>]

hi diego - would you indicate these conditions in your doc.

thanks,
- dimitri.

Diego Caviglia wrote:

> Hi Dimitri,
>                  for sure GR and its extensions reduce the possibility 
> that the CP fails permanently but do not make it zero.  I mean it is 
> possible that the CP is not able to restart for a long period of time, or 
> that some of its data are corrupted and so on.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Diego
>
>
> Please respond to dpapadimitriou@psg.com; Please respond to 
> dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be
> To:     Diego Caviglia <Diego.Caviglia@marconi.com>
> cc:     ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
>
> Subject:        Re: Revision 02 of draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs
>
> hi diego
>
> could you please explain positioning of section 2.2 wrt to control plane 
> recovery we have today defined in GR and extensions
>
> much thanks,
> - dimitri.
>
> Diego Caviglia wrote:
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >               seems that the revision 02 of the draft in subject has 
>
> been 
>
> > published 
> > (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-02.txt) 
> > on the repository.
> >
> > This revision addresses the last comments we received from Dimitri and 
> > Adrian.
> >
> > If I've understood correctly what we decided yestarday this version is 
> > candidate to become WG document, is this correct Adrian?
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > Diego