Re: Revision 02 of draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs

["Diego Caviglia" <Diego.Caviglia@marconi.com>]

Hi Dimitri,
                 for sure GR and its extensions reduce the possibility that
the CP fails permanently but do not make it zero.  I mean it is possible
that the CP is not able to restart for a long period of time, or that some
of its data are corrupted and so on.

Best Regards

Diego



dimitri papadimitriou <dpapadimitriou@psg.com> on 12/07/2006 00.06.21

Please respond to dpapadimitriou@psg.com; Please respond to
       dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be

To:    Diego Caviglia <Diego.Caviglia@marconi.com>
cc:    ccamp@ops.ietf.org

Subject:    Re: Revision 02 of draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs

hi diego

could you please explain positioning of section 2.2 wrt to control plane
recovery we have today defined in GR and extensions

much thanks,
- dimitri.

Diego Caviglia wrote:

> Hi all,
>                seems that the revision 02 of the draft in subject has
been
> published
> (
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-02.txt
)
> on the repository.
>
> This revision addresses the last comments we received from Dimitri and
> Adrian.
>
> If I've understood correctly what we decided yestarday this version is
> candidate to become WG document, is this correct Adrian?
>
> Best Regards
>
> Diego
>
>