[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Any objection on recommending upstream and downstream component links to be the same,
- To: "ccamp" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Any objection on recommending upstream and downstream component links to be the same,
- From: "Zafar Ali \(zali\)" <zali@cisco.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 02:08:01 -0400
- Authentication-results: rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com; header.From=zali@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( 59 extraneous bytes; sig from cisco.com verified; );
- Cc: "Richard Rabbat" <richard@us.fujitsu.com>, "Kohei Shiomoto" <shiomoto.kohei@lab.ntt.co.jp>, "Rajiv Papneja" <rpapneja@isocore.com>
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=2771; t=1152511688; x=1153375688; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=zali@cisco.com; z=From:=22Zafar=20Ali=20\(zali\)=22=20<zali@cisco.com> |Subject:Any=20objection=20on=20recommending=20upstream=20and=20downstream=20comp onent=20links=20to=20be=20the=20same,=20 |To:=22ccamp=22=20<ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3Drz3x9nD+zpHiaaeZHqJMiim0JAE=3D; b=xl5f19CINOrVW3dFQomI1Qv53BlCWZ2Gt3+2ydBFWFd6dKBpre3II1Dq1vvo2n8ETxj7GmUA /E3atAP7x7l4r6ox0en1A01R9I5+78t9Pr/XVcXXLPQasFefoNCIpUl7;
Dear CCAMP-ers/ authors of addressing-id,
While section "7.2. Component Link
Identification" in draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-addressing-04.txt
is at this subject, I would suggest that this draft puts forward
a RECOMMENDATION for making upstream and downstream component links to be
the same.
Thanks
Regards...
Zafar