[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Comments on draft-li-ccamp-multinodes-gr-proc-00.txt,
- To: <danli@huawei.com>, <gjhhit@huawei.com>
- Subject: Comments on draft-li-ccamp-multinodes-gr-proc-00.txt,
- From: "Zafar Ali \(zali\)" <zali@cisco.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 23:04:23 -0400
- Authentication-results: rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com; header.From=zali@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( 59 extraneous bytes; sig from cisco.com verified; );
- Cc: "ccamp" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=4953; t=1152500666; x=1153364666; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=zali@cisco.com; z=From:=22Zafar=20Ali=20\(zali\)=22=20<zali@cisco.com> |Subject:Comments=20on=20draft-li-ccamp-multinodes-gr-proc-00.txt,=20 |To:<danli@huawei.com>,=20<gjhhit@huawei.com>; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DlBipv95fPTUiCzc7qf0FNY9mZq4=3D; b=auMCWMHAgXSPPmb1nqqGIlyawn1wCevMFioSpVstjkYZV05PYDA8tiZhH9mgStYeed7XvPfU HZWb1lYPdyq5vzA9szzWmXZCI/BNGq7CmhGo8B3gX9ZSVnapZ+Ql0Fn8;
Dear Authors,
This is Deja-vu to
me....
Draft
draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-restart-ext-05.txt
actually had a section on multiple node restart case and was rejected by the WG
as addressing multiple node restart case is NOT a goal (suffers from the
law of diminishing return). In other words the following statement in the ID-
"[GR-EXT] also extends the Hello
message to exchange information about
the ability to support the
RecoveryPath message.
The examples and procedures in [GR-EXT] focus on the description of a
single node restart when
adjacent network nodes are operative.
Although the procedures are
equally applicable to multi-node restarts,
no detailed explanation is
provided."
Thanks
Regards... Zafar