[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Progressing docs
Hi,
Yes to all.
Ichiro
At 23:15 06/04/03, Igor Bryskin wrote:
>Yes to all.
>
>Igor
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Kireeti Kompella" <kireeti@juniper.net>
>To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
>Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 2:12 PM
>Subject: Progressing docs
>
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This is to double-check support *on the list* for the following I-Ds
>> to go to WG docs:
>>
>> a) MPLS-GMPLS interworking
>> draft-shiomoto-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-fmwk-01.txt
>> b) "hierarchy bis"
>> draft-shiomoto-ccamp-lsp-hierarchy-bis-01.txt
>> c) Call Support
>> draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-call-00.txt
>> d) Ethernet TSpec
>> draft-dimitri-mef-ethernet-traffic-parameters-00.txt
>> e) OSPF-TE MIB
>> draft-otani-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-mib-02.txt
>>
>> Please say for each if you think it should/should not become a WG doc.
>>
>> My previous email was in error: the "excellent" support was for the
>> migration doc. Just to be clear, we'll double-check all these docs.
>>
>> Kireeti.
>> -------
>>