Re: Progressing docs

["Igor Bryskin" <ibryskin@movaz.com>]

Yes to all.

Igor

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kireeti Kompella" <kireeti@juniper.net>
To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 2:12 PM
Subject: Progressing docs


> Hi All,
> 
> This is to double-check support *on the list* for the following I-Ds 
> to go to WG docs:
> 
> a) MPLS-GMPLS interworking
>   draft-shiomoto-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-fmwk-01.txt
> b) "hierarchy bis"
>   draft-shiomoto-ccamp-lsp-hierarchy-bis-01.txt
> c) Call Support
>   draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-call-00.txt
> d) Ethernet TSpec
>   draft-dimitri-mef-ethernet-traffic-parameters-00.txt
> e) OSPF-TE MIB
>   draft-otani-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-mib-02.txt
> 
> Please say for each if you think it should/should not become a WG doc.
> 
> My previous email was in error: the "excellent" support was for the 
> migration doc.  Just to be clear, we'll double-check all these docs.
> 
> Kireeti.
> -------
>