Re: Fw: COMMENT: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello

[dimitri papadimitriou <dpapadimitriou@psg.com>]

adrian - comment will be addressed and a re-spin by cut-off

thanks for the pointer,
- dimitri.

Adrian Farrel wrote:

> FYI
>
> This I-D has finally started to move forwards again.
>
> The GenArt review produced the comment shown below.
>
> Authors: please make a suggestion for a new paragraph for inclusion in an
> early section of the I-D that will clarify the meaning of "optimal".
>
> Thanks.
> Adrian
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Brian Carpenter" <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
> To: <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: <kireeti@juniper.net>; <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:24 AM
> Subject: COMMENT: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello
>
>
>
> > Comment:
> > From Gen-ART review by Spencer Dawkins, in case the document is
> > updated for any other reason:
> >
> > There was one point that I wish was explained better - there are five
>
> different places in the draft where a statement like "use of Node-ID based
> Hello session is optimal for detecting signaling adjacency failure" is
> made , but "optimal" is never explained or put in context. I can guess
> what I think it means, but I'm guessing, and a sentence or two of
> explanation might make the document clearer for many readers.
>
> >
>
>
>
> .