Fw: COMMENT: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

FYI

This I-D has finally started to move forwards again.

The GenArt review produced the comment shown below.

Authors: please make a suggestion for a new paragraph for inclusion in an
early section of the I-D that will clarify the meaning of "optimal".

Thanks.
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian Carpenter" <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
To: <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: <kireeti@juniper.net>; <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:24 AM
Subject: COMMENT: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello


> Comment:
> From Gen-ART review by Spencer Dawkins, in case the document is
> updated for any other reason:
>
> There was one point that I wish was explained better - there are five
different places in the draft where a statement like "use of Node-ID based
Hello session is optimal for detecting signaling adjacency failure" is
made , but "optimal" is never explained or put in context. I can guess
what I think it means, but I'm guessing, and a sentence or two of
explanation might make the document clearer for many readers.
>
>
>