RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-09.txt

["Jorge Pinto" <Jorge.Pinto@siemens.com>]

Hi Kireeti,

	I don't quite follow you on this mail... I'm not at all familiar with IETF procedures regarding document commenting, so this one got me thinking:
	I've posted a comment (addreseed to Ccamp, Kireeti an Yakov) on the last draft (...-extensions-9.txt), dated 4-12-2002. I get the feeling that i should have waited for ccamp's WG Last Call Event regarding this draft, or my comment won't be analysed... or not (confused)... i get this feeling from the "no comments were received in the two week window soliciting comments" phrase on your last mail.
	IMHO the Last Call Event isn't a MUST, but with all the burocracy we see everyday (not here) it makes me wonder. Anyway, could someone (to free Kireeti from the "answer to moron" task) confirm to me that, besides the pathetic content, my comment will get the slightest attention of the WG? Thanks in advance,

Jorge Pinto

-----Original Message-----
From: Kireeti Kompella [mailto:kireeti@juniper.net]
Sent: Sexta-feira, 6 de Dezembro de 2002 6:59
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Cc: ospf@discuss.microsoft.com
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-09.txt


Hi All,

On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:

> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF.
>
> 	Title		: OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS
> 	Author(s)	: K. Kompella, Y. Rekhter
> 	Filename	: draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-09.txt
> 	Pages		: 12
> 	Date		: 2002-12-3
>
> This document specifies encoding of extensions to the OSPF routing
> protocol in support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching.

The CCAMP WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-08.txt
and for draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-routing-05.txt ended Aug 28, 2002; the
authors only got one comment on the former (a typo).  The new version
announced above fixes the typo, makes some minor formatting changes,
and spruces up the Security Considerations (essentially copied from
the OSPF TE doc).  The latter document is unchanged.

The OSPF WG was notified on Sept 30, 2002 that the above documents
finished CCAMP WG Last Call; no comments were received in the two
week window soliciting comments.

These documents will now be forwarded to the IESG as standards track
documents requesting an IETF Last Call.

Kireeti.