[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question in draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-03.txt

The OID (varbind) arugment serves to identify the object instance.
Thus, the lmpCcOperStatus carries the CC ID (the status
is know from trap type).

Yes, a single trap definition, such as "lmpCCStatusChange"
with lmpCCOperStatus as the varbind would work just as well.

/Baktha


At 09:21 AM 7/22/2002 -0500, Jing Qian wrote:

Hi, Bert

Did you mean OID is automatically as part of the trap message payload?
If in this case, why all the other trap still put the OID in the OBJECT
part?
For example, in draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-03.txt:
        lmpDataLinkPropertyMismatch NOTIFICATION-TYPE
           OBJECTS       { ifIndex,
                                         lmpDataLinkRemoteIfId }
        lmpTeLinkDegraded NOTIFICATION-TYPE
           OBJECTS       { ifIndex }

Also, why need lmpCcOperStatus for lmpControlChannelUp and
lmpControlChannelDown? The trap message name already define
the lmpCcOperStatus.

Regards,

Jing


"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" wrote:

> If you send the AdminStatus and OperStatus, then
> ythe CcId comes automatically as part of the OID
> (namely the index part).
>
> Thanks,
> Bert
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jing Qian [mailto:jing.qian@alcatel.com]
> > Sent: vrijdag 19 juli 2002 17:36
> > To: martin.dubuc@meriton.com
> > Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: Question in draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-03.txt
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Mr. Dubuc:
> >
> > A small question:
> >
> > In  draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-02.txt and
> > draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-03.txt,
> >
> > lmpControlChannelUp NOTIFICATION-TYPE
> >    OBJECTS       { lmpCcAdminStatus, lmpCcOperStatus }
> > lmpControlChannelDown NOTIFICATION-TYPE
> >    OBJECTS       { lmpCcAdminStatus, lmpCcOperStatus }
> >
> > In draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-01.txt:
> > lmpControlChannelUp NOTIFICATION-TYPE
> >    OBJECTS       { lmpCcId }
> > lmpControlChannelDown NOTIFICATION-TYPE
> >    OBJECTS       { lmpCcId }
> >
> > Is this a type mistake in draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-02.txt and
> > draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-03.txt? Since there are multiple control
> > channels in one node, lmpCcId as an OBJECTS makes more sense to me.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jing Qian
> >