RE: Question in draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-03.txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

If you send the AdminStatus and OperStatus, then
ythe CcId comes automatically as part of the OID
(namely the index part).

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jing Qian [mailto:jing.qian@alcatel.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 19 juli 2002 17:36
> To: martin.dubuc@meriton.com
> Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Question in draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-03.txt
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Mr. Dubuc:
> 
> A small question:
> 
> In  draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-02.txt and 
> draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-03.txt,
> 
> lmpControlChannelUp NOTIFICATION-TYPE
>    OBJECTS       { lmpCcAdminStatus, lmpCcOperStatus }
> lmpControlChannelDown NOTIFICATION-TYPE
>    OBJECTS       { lmpCcAdminStatus, lmpCcOperStatus }
> 
> In draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-01.txt:
> lmpControlChannelUp NOTIFICATION-TYPE
>    OBJECTS       { lmpCcId }
> lmpControlChannelDown NOTIFICATION-TYPE
>    OBJECTS       { lmpCcId }
> 
> Is this a type mistake in draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-02.txt and
> draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-03.txt? Since there are multiple control
> channels in one node, lmpCcId as an OBJECTS makes more sense to me.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jing Qian
>