RE: Re: WG document status

[ananth.nagarajan@mail.sprint.com]

> 
> but in any case, if there are multiple interoperational 
> implementations,
> then documenting that fact does not seem like a bad idea
>

So does the lack of interoperable implementations hinder the process to 
progress this specific document (or other documents in CCAMP) as 
proposed standard? 

or will that be a requirement only when progressing it beyond proposed 
standard to draft standard and further? 

Ananth
 
> Scott
> 
>