[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: changes to draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-00.txt



>> The solution can be tunneling, but also also double 
>translation (4->6->4) as described at least in NATv4v6v4 and 
>MNAT-PT drafts.
>>   
>but we are not reccomending that, right?

Right. 

I'm looking forward to see the next version of the draft.

	Teemu