From: "Jukka MJ Manner" <jmanner@cs.Helsinki.FI>
Date: May 14, 2008 3:51:08 PM GMT+02:00
To: Transport Area WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>, Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org
>
Subject: [Int-area] RSVP for IPv6 implementors: your use of RAO
value 3
Hi,
We are in the middle of fixing the IP Router Alert Option registry and
allocations, and one issue affects the current RSVP implementations.
There are two values that indicate end-to-end RSVP:
"1" Datagram contains RSVP message [RFC2711]
"3" RSVP Aggregation Level 0 [RFC3175]
We are currently proposing that value "3" should be removed from
use, and
reserved (not to be allocated to any protocol). Thus, value "1"
should be
used to indicate end-to-end RSVP.
The question is: who have RSVP implementations for IPv6, and would
this
change break something?
Regards,
Jukka
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area