Re: NAT64 and IPsec support

[marcelo bagnulo <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>]

Michael Richardson escribió:
> > > > > > "Pekka" == Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> writes:
> > > > > >             
>     Pekka> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>     >> I think we are bundling several different cases together. I will try to
>     >> enumerate the use cases, to clarify the situation a bit:
>
>     Pekka> What about IPsec in Alain Durand's scenario:
>
>     Pekka> v4-only host == NAT64 === v6-only network ==== NAT64 === v4-only network === v4-only host
>
>   That just looks like multiple layers of NATv4 to IPsec.
>   that's the whole point of v4v6v4, right?
>
>   
FWFI, I am not considering the v4v6v4 case in this analysis so far, 
cause this seems like a clear candidate for tunneling which is a far 
better solution imho

we are concerned about the case of a communication IPv6<->IPv4

Regards, marcelo