[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 6to4 considered a bad thing
On 2/1/08 7:17 PM, "james woodyatt" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Is ISP X suppose to announce a
>> de-aggregate of 2002://16? That would create a huge increase in the
>> table size...
> That's clearly not a good idea.
Now, please help me reconcile how can a return relay for ISP X *only*
advertize 2002::/16 (and nothing smaller) and not offer free return transit
for people that are not its customers?