Re: 6to4 considered a bad thing

[Alain Durand <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>]

On 2/1/08 7:17 PM, "james woodyatt" <jhw@apple.com> wrote:

>> Is ISP X suppose to announce a
>> de-aggregate of 2002://16? That would create a huge increase in the
>> routing
>> table size...
> 
> That's clearly not a good idea.

Now, please help me reconcile how can a return relay for ISP X *only*
advertize 2002::/16 (and nothing smaller) and not offer free return transit
for people that are not its customers?

  - Alain.