Re: What we disagree on RE: TE Requirements Draft-ELSP

[Shai Herzog <sherzog@hyperchip.com>]

At 1010 AM 04/12/2001, Francois Le Faucheur wrote
>Nabil and Shahram,
>
>The one option we disagree on is
>(iiia) Using E-LSPs with traffic from multiple OAs with multiple BW and 
>single value for all other attributes (preemption, CT, affinity...).

I for one disagree that E-LSPs with Multiple OAs and single BW are
technically (or theoretically) sound. Not to use the cliche of apples
and oranges, pretty much it is equivalent to:

Given a box, how many watermelons and cherries can you fit inside it?

Since different OAs are disjoint, and draw from different pools,
how do you propose we split the single BW parameters among the multiple
OAs?

Shai