RE: WG Last Call draft-ietf-sming-reqs-04.txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David T. Perkins [mailto:dperkins@dsperkins.com]
> Sent: donderdag 16 augustus 2001 21:47
> To: Jon Saperia
> Cc: Olivier Dubuisson; sming@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: WG Last Call draft-ietf-sming-reqs-04.txt 
> 
> 
> HI,
> 
> Jon - it sounds to me like you are mixing together two 
> separate issues.
> 
> The first issue is whether or not it makes sense to create a new and
> quite different language for defining management information for the
> SNMP protocol.
> 
And this is not what the WG Last Call is for.
The WG Last Call is for trying to get (rough) WG consensus that the
Requirements/oibjectives document is good enuf to publish as
Informational RFC and that we can go on with REAL work and use the
informational RFC as a guideline and our common sense to evaluate
those requirements/objectives as we struggle further on our path to
try and complete the WG charter work items.

Bert