[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: fragmenting the discussion space

To: "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>
Subject: RE: fragmenting the discussion space
From: Kurtis Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:29:20 +0200 (EET)
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>, avri@psg.com, shim6 <shim6@psg.com>
In-reply-to: <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B0895CC07@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net>
References: <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B0895CC07@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net>


	Jim,

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Bound, Jim wrote:

> Agree but the devil is in the details as you know.  Getting shims
> deployed in Linux and BSD is one thing getting them deployed in products
> is a completely different manner and implementation analysis and effect
> will be mandatory for consideration.  I will be able to help on that
> front.  I still believe if SCTP was deployed problem is solved.

the problem is that that still assumes SCTP and only SCTP. And that again
requires deployment and updates.

- kurtis -

References:
- RE: fragmenting the discussion space
  - From: "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>

Prev by Date: RE: shim - transport/app communication
Next by Date: RE: shim - transport/app communication
Previous by thread: Re: fragmenting the discussion space
Next by thread: RE: fragmenting the discussion space
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread