[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing
marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
So, i guess that my point is that when a non shim node is involved in a
communication, it would be good if we did more that just detecting that
the shim is not supported, but we could deploy mechanisms to provide
enhanced fault tolerance in this scenario.
(It could also be noted that such mechanism is likely to be much simpler
than the whole shim and that it will, by itself, provide some degree of
fault tolerance, so it may make sense to deploy it even without the shim)
It makes sense to me.