[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing
> well, i am not sure about this...
> My point was about establishing new communication after an outage with
> external hosts that don't implement the shim.
> This is important becuase at least in the early days, most of nodes
> won't implement shim.
> Explicitly taking this point into consideration would allow to provide
> some degree of fault tolerance (i.e. the capability of establishing new
> communications after an outage) even in communications with nodes that
> don't implement the shim.
This is a general transition issue; I guess the protocol should specify how
an shim6 endpoint works with a non-shim6 endpoint.