[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-radext-digest-auth-06, secure connection

To: "Emile van Bergen" <openradius-radextwg@e-advies.nl>, "wolfgang.beck01@t-online.de"@t-online.de
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-radext-digest-auth-06, secure connection
From: "wolfgang.beck01@t-online.de" <wolfgang.beck01@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:47:32 +0200
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20051017103056.GB3858@note.evbergen.xs4all.nl>
References: <1ERRte-0ZvM9I0@fwd35.aul.t-online.de> <20051017103056.GB3858@note.evbergen.xs4all.nl>

Emile,

several versions ago I've used "secure connection" instead of IPsec.
This
was considered as too vague. Is an unencrypted MPLS VPN secure? How
secure is a dedicated leased line, if you don't know how it is
implemented?

Wolfgang



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- draft-ietf-radext-digest-auth-06
  - From: "wolfgang.beck01@t-online.de" <wolfgang.beck01@t-online.de>
- Re: draft-ietf-radext-digest-auth-06
  - From: Emile van Bergen <openradius-radextwg@e-advies.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: capabilities problem
Next by Date: Re: capabilities problem
Previous by thread: Re: draft-ietf-radext-digest-auth-06
Next by thread: RE: draft-ietf-radext-digest-auth-06
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread