Re: Issue:

[Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>]

Assigned Issue 91.

Are there any objections to these changes?

Otherwise, I propose that this Issue be accepted.

On Wed, 11 May 2005, Beck01, Wolfgang wrote:

> typos in section 'RADIUS server behaviour'
>
> Submitter name: Wolfgang Beck
> Submitter email address: beckw@t-systems.com
> Date first submitted: 11 May 2005
> Document: draft-ietf-radext-digest-auth-02.txt
> Comment type: E
> Priority: S
> Section: 2.2
> Rationale/Explanation of issue:
> missing verb in
>   'The RADIUS server Digest-Realm, Message-Authenticator (see
>    [RFC3579]), SHOULD add Digest-Algorithm, one or more Digest-Qop and
>    MAY add Digest-Domain, Digest-Opaque attributes to the Access-
>    Challenge message.'
>
> and
>
>    'A RADIUS MUST check if the RADIUS client is authorized to serve users
>    of the realm mentioned in the Digest-Realm attribute.'
>
> Requested change:
>   'The RADIUS server MUST add Digest-Realm, Message-Authenticator (see
>    [RFC3579]), SHOULD add Digest-Algorithm, one or more Digest-Qop and
>    MAY add Digest-Domain, Digest-Opaque attributes to the Access-
>    Challenge message.'
>
>    'A RADIUS server MUST check if the RADIUS client is authorized to
>    serve users of the realm mentioned in the Digest-Realm attribute.'
>
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>