[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [eap] RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party

To: "Glen Zorn (gwz)" <gwz@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: [eap] RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party
From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "'Blumenthal, Uri'" <uri.blumenthal@intel.com>, radiusext@ops.ietf.org, eap@frascone.com, isms@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200504261513.j3QFD354016485@ams-core-1.cisco.com>
References: <200504261513.j3QFD354016485@ams-core-1.cisco.com>

> If one has a sore toe, shooting oneself in the foot may seem to
> satisfy "today's need"; in the long run, however, it will probably
> turn out to be counterproductive.

"Probably".  I sense a window large enough for an elephant to walk through
:)

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- RE: [eap] RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party
  - From: "Glen Zorn \(gwz\)" <gwz@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [eap] RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party
Next by Date: RE: Issue 83: CUI and re-authentication
Previous by thread: RE: [eap] RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party
Next by thread: RE: [eap] RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread