[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Issue 83: CUI and re-authentication

To: "Adrangi, Farid" <farid.adrangi@intel.com>
Subject: RE: Issue 83: CUI and re-authentication
From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org, "Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>
In-reply-to: <F3DAEAD1F408F44FA1AF0BFAC11FEF9503447C65@orsmsx408>
References: <F3DAEAD1F408F44FA1AF0BFAC11FEF9503447C65@orsmsx408>

OK.  You might clarify that in the document.


On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Adrangi, Farid wrote:

> No. The "Validation" means that the RADIUS server checks to see if the
> CUI value is the same as the one that was sent in the previous
> Access-Accept.   However, the RADIUS server does not require to do this
> validation.
> Thanks,
> Farid
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:aboba@internaut.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 6:50 PM
> > To: Adrangi, Farid
> > Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org; Nelson, David
> > Subject: RE: Issue 83: CUI and re-authentication
> >
> >
> > Presumably, by "validated" you mean that the CUI presented is
> > associated with the subsequently authenticated identity.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- RE: Issue 83: CUI and re-authentication
  - From: "Adrangi, Farid" <farid.adrangi@intel.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Issue: 2486bis internationalization and ! syntax
Next by Date: Re: [eap] Implementation Survey: How does your EAP peer/RADIUS proxy handle internationalization? (fwd)
Previous by thread: RE: Issue 83: CUI and re-authentication
Next by thread: RE: Issue 83: CUI and re-authentication
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread