RE: [RADIUS location attributes] Minor comment on Operator-type attribute

[<jouni.korhonen@teliasonera.com>]

Lionel,

Just for my clarification.. Your proposed change would still allow
delegating the control and management of certain namespace to the
some organization of choice e.g. to GSMA, right?

Cheers,
       Jouni

-----Original Message-----
From:	owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org on behalf of MORAND Lionel RD-CORE-ISS
Sent:	Mon 4/18/2005 11:45 AM
To:	Hannes Tschofenig; avi@bridgewatersystems.com
Cc:	radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Subject:	[RADIUS location attributes] Minor comment on Operator-type attribute
Hi Hannes,

As explained during the last RADEXT meeting, I would prefer to remove
the wording "Operator-Type" and replace by "Operator-Namespace". This
attrbute doesn't define anymore the operator's type but in which
namespace its name is defined. I wouldn't like to see any confusion
between the name used by an operator (e.g. France Telecom) and the
operator's type (ISP, telco, mobile, fixed, or whatever).

Lionel

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>




--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>