Re: FW: [Pana] RADIUS Access-Reject and NAP/ISP authz

["Alan DeKok" <aland@ox.org>]

Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com> wrote:
> > FYI, more "Access-Reject doesn't _really_ mean Access-Reject"
> > nonsense, this time (perhaps predictably) from the PANA WG.  I
> > particularly like case #2, where L2 access is denied but IP access
> > is magically provided (avian transport, maybe?).  We _really_ need
> > to do something about this...
> 
> Care to make a proposal about what that "something" might be?

  A new issue submitted for RFC 2869, which is a related topic.

http://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2005/msg00256.html

  And:

http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/RADEXT/#Issue%2068

  also addresses the semantics of using Access-Reject outside of the
scope of PPP, and how it should be interpreted.

  Alan DeKok.


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>