[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
last call for a Call Home BoF
- To: "ops- nm"@ops.ietf.org, isms@ietf.org, call-home@ietf.org
- Subject: last call for a Call Home BoF
- From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:12:57 +0200
- Authentication-results: imail.cisco.com; header.From=lear@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( message from cisco.com verified; );
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=1932; t=1129105431; x=1129537631; c=nowsp; s=nebraska; h=Subject:From:Date:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; z=Subject:last=20call=20for=20a=20Call=20Home=20BoF| From:Eliot=20Lear=20<lear@cisco.com>| Date:Wed,=2012=20Oct=202005=2010=3A12=3A57=20+0200| Content-Type:text/plain=3B=20charset=3DISO-8859-1=3B=20format=3Dflowed| Content-Transfer-Encoding:7bit; b=HMPtSMIPPWVMgx4ahNPbMftO4YsS9yKsA+ZDiZlJdx6RwtaI9Wj9b0d5wYdqMod6ePUVuPSZ fEFQeNuTzrCdYdnjaWs/kB8vmIchiBtdSut4JDaWphIT26DiRmcq2TrBoKslZ24lK5uGrizhU9d 1PBWHqy4yWKP9xtBUbsBCR9E=
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.4.1 (Macintosh/20051006)
After all of the mail last month, Bert is considering allowing a BoF on
the topic of Call Home. I initially posted a note to the call-home
mailing list announcing the possibility of a BoF. Response to that note
was - well - underwhelming. If you are interested in seeing one, could
you please reply to this email, CCing the call-home mailing list. Here
is a draft agenda. It is subject to your input.
If we do not see much input, I'm going to drop the request to Bert.
Eliot
Title: callhome
Period of time: 1 hour
Area: ops-nm
Expected # attendees: 40-60 (small room)
Don't conflict with: ISMS, ops-area, netconf (if there is one)
Short Description: Discussion of Architectural Issues Concerning
protocols that could benefit from reversing
of roles
Long Description:
Certain protocols, and in particular management protocols where
devices on either end of connection take client server roles may
be able to take advantage of "Call Home" functionality, when
traditional roles are reversed, and a server connect to a client.
Examples of existing protocols that make use of call home include
SMTP [ETRN] and COPS. At this BoF we will look at extending such
functionality into other protocols, as well as any architectural
issues this raises.
This work stems from efforts in ISMS to extend SNMP to run over SSH,
as well as work as work that has gone on in NETCONF.
We will begin with a discussion of
draft-lear-callhome-description-0[1,2].txt, which contains a description
of call home, what problems it can solve, and what some of the
architectural issues are. During the BoF we may identify additional
such issues as well as protocols other than management protocols that
could benefit from this work. An additional potential question should
be whether a generic standard or process should be used to implement
call home, such as rules for SSH.
There are three possible outcomes: a working group to add "call home"
functionality to existing protocols such as SNMP/SSH and NETCONF/SSH,
use of existing working groups for this purpose, or nothing.
Chair: Eliot Lear (or tbd)
Agenda:
Agenda bashing - 1 minute
Presentation of draft-lear-callhome-description-00.txt 19 minutes
Application to SNMP and open areas - 10 minutes
Discussion including architectural issues - 20 minutes
Moving Forward Options - 10 minutes