[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 9.4) Partial locks

To: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Issue 9.4) Partial locks
From: William Caban <william@hpcf.upr.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:08:47 -0400
Cc: NetConf <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20031202161033.028e6a18@fedex.cisco.com>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20031202161033.028e6a18@fedex.cisco.com>

On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 20:11, Andy Bierman wrote:
> Should a variant of the lock operation support the
> specification of a subset of the data model?
Only if is an optional capability since there are some scenarios where
partial lock is not a good idea and others where is a major plus.


> 9.4.1) Partial lock proposal
I vote for it.

-- 
William Caban <william@hpcf.upr.edu>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Issue 9.4) Partial locks
  - From: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>

References:
- Issue 9.4) Partial locks
  - From: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Issue 9.2) <steal-lock>
Next by Date: Re: Issue 9.2) <steal-lock>
Previous by thread: Issue 9.4) Partial locks
Next by thread: Re: Issue 9.4) Partial locks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread