[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 6.1) SOAP Proxy

To: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Issue 6.1) SOAP Proxy
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 08:36:35 -0800
Cc: netconf@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20031202160207.029dc460@fedex.cisco.com>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20031202160207.029dc460@fedex.cisco.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031121

Andy, this issue is broader. As Phil pointed out, if people use SOAP/HTTP transparent proxies could cause all sorts of trouble, particularly because NETCONF has a session-based view and HTTP does not.

Or is this a different ISSUE?

Eliot

Andy Bierman wrote:

NETCONF has no proxy; text related to proxy should be removed


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Issue 6.1) SOAP Proxy
  - From: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>

References:
- Issue 6.1) SOAP Proxy
  - From: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Issue 5.1) SSH End of message directive
Next by Date: Re: Issue 9.1) DoS attack using global <lock>
Previous by thread: Issue 6.1) SOAP Proxy
Next by thread: Re: Issue 6.1) SOAP Proxy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread