Re: Separation of protocol and information model

[Bobby Krupczak <rdk@krupczak.org>]

Hi!

>We felt the same way.  Early on there was talk of forming a WG to tackle the
>development of some standard schema but that seems to have died down.  Our
>preference was to design a very simple protocol and develop some of the more
>complicated features (killing sessions, locking, copying and validating
>configurations, etc.) in a standard MIB along with a standard equipment
>model, interface models, and so on.  It seems, though, that we are on a
>course to build some of the complicated features into the protocol and stop
>there.

We've done many of these types of things in SystemEDGE and they never
modeled very well in SNMP's SMI nor were they handled very well in the
SNMP protocol itself.

Bobby

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>