Re: namespace and schema

[Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>]

jtsillas writes:
>The draft recommends that we use qualified element and attribute defs for o=
>ur target namespace schemas. Yet, the xmlconf schema itself uses unqualifie=
>d names and attributes. What is the intent?

The recommendation is for avoiding unqualified attributes, which belong
to a namespace outside your knowledge and control. Yes, we should do
this in our schema files.

>So far I'm seeing a couple of things still missing from the schema (hello e=
>lement and the operation of edit-config). Is a new rev coming out soon?

Rob would know for sure, for I think it's got to be soon. Please
send in any additional bugs you see.

Thanks,
 Phil

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>