Re: Thoughts on NetConf Requirements

[Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>]

>>>>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:11:08 -0700, Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com> said:

Andy> I guess is too short, certainly with respect to all the various
Andy> attributes that may be taken into consideration in establishing
Andy> a security policy.

I'm glad I think we've finally connected.

Andy> BTW, my comment above was directed at the difference between
Andy> read and write operations.

Andy> I still think configuration of authorization mechanisms is
Andy> something that should be standardized independently of
Andy> the netconf 1.0 effort.  That was the assumption that 
Andy> went into the charter. 

I agree.  It should be the next thing tackled, IMHO, but you can defer
it for now.  It will affect the data model, however, only in that the
data model must be able to contain a description of the necessary
security components (which, IMHO, includes the transport mechanisms as
I've been saying).

-- 
"In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap,
 and much more difficult to find."  -- Terry Pratchett

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>