RE: Thoughts on NetConf Requirements

["Allen, Keith" <kallen@tri.sbc.com>]

Randy Presuhn wrote:

> Ironically, back when ISO and ITU-T were actively working on OSI
> management, we found that the FCAPS distinction was not terribly
> helpful in protocol design decisions, and that many objects and
> attributes were of interest to multiple areas.  I think FCAPS helps
> one think about product opportunities, and potential use cases for
> bits of information, but am wary of using it to partition protocol or
> object functions.

> Randy

Randy,

I couldn't agree with you more.

Keith Allen
SBC Labs
9505 Arboretum Blvd.
Austin, TX 78759
(512) 372-5741
kallen@tri.sbc.com
 



--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>