Re: Thoughts on NetConf Requirements

[Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>]

At 10:42 AM 6/5/2003, Randy Bush wrote:
>> IMO, the authorization model amounts to a set of tuples:
>>    { user, operations-allowed, element-subtree }.
>
>actually, for state, i likely want a scatter read of some pieces
>from a bunch of parts of subtrees of which i may not have privilege
>for the parent tree.

That just amounts to more tuples with finer granularity sub-trees.


>> I hope we all can agree that the essence of good engineering
>> is how simple you can make the solution, not how complex it
>> can be.  
>
>La perfection est atteinte non quand il  You know you've achieved
>ne reste rien à ajouter, mais quand il   perfection in design, not when you
>ne reste rien à enlever.                 have nothing more to add, but when
>                                        you have nothing more to take away.
>-- Antoine-Marie-Roger de Saint-Exupery

Andy


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>