RE: do we need filtering or some such

["Chen, Weijing" <wchen@tri.sbc.com>]

> Ahh, you're reading more into the target configuration capability
> than we intended when writing the draft.
> 
So the protocol limits the capability of data model?

> Since you haven't specified any identifier for the ospf interface,
> you're getting ospf instance 1, area 2, which would include
> all configuration for that area. The interface and adminStatus
> elements as specified are superfluous (in fact one would assume
> the configuration fragment as specified wouldn't validate, because
> there's no identifying attribute on the interface and the schema would
> require one).
>
We did not have the schema. It is just an illustrative example. To say it
superfluous is jumping the gun.




--

Weijing Chen






--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>