Re: Separation of configuration and control - good or bad?

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "Larry Menten" <lmenten@lucent.com>
> To: "netconf" <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 2:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Separation of configuration and control - good or bad?
...
> >Just to be clear: distinguishing the "definitive" configuration from that of
> >the device (or network) does *not* require hosting it on an element
> >manager.  It could be somewhere else entirely, and all the element
> >manager would do would be to tell the device to update itself, perhaps
> >by sending it the configuration's URL.
> >
> >Randy
> >
> >
>
> The problem is the same.  It does not accommodate SOHO management.
...

How so?  This wouldn't prevent the configuration "document" from living
on the managed element.  The important point (already recognized in the
current i-d) is that there is a distinction between manipulating the configuration
document and having it actually take effect.

Randy



--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>