[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Pls check draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry-04.txt

To: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Subject: Re: Pls check draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry-04.txt
From: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 15:01:16 +0100
Cc: "Xmlconf (E-mail)" <xmlconf@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20030426131104.024ff000@fedex.cisco.com>
References: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155016A3D34@nl0006exch001u.nl .lucent.com>

At 13:34 26/04/2003 -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:

General issues with the document:

[...]

2) explanation of static fields
   Given the structure 'urn:ietf:params:xml:<class>:<id>'
   there is no mention of the static fields 'urn:ietf:params:xml'
   What is the 'params' field used for? It doesn't seem to be useful.

This is derived from a separate proposal...

  http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mealling-iana-urn-04.txt

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E


--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>

References:
- Re: Pls check draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry-04.txt
  - From: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Pls check draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry-04.txt
Next by Date: Protocol security features (was Re: how bad is soap?)
Previous by thread: Re: Pls check draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry-04.txt
Next by thread: Re: Pls check draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry-04.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread