RE: how bad is soap?

["Allen, Keith" <kallen@tri.sbc.com>]

When people say:

> If BEEP is used, then don't see much value for the SOAP envelope or RPC
> as they become redundant.

Are they referring to the RPC mechanism defined in the Enns draft?  Or some
other RPC mechanism?

Are you saying that RPC and SOAP are not needed with BEEP because BEEP is
message-oriented, defines encoding rules, and enables you to match up
responses with requests?


Keith Allen
SBC Technology Resources
9505 Arboretum Blvd.
Austin, TX 78759
(512) 372-5741
kallen@tri.sbc.com
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Crozier (kcrozier) [mailto:kcrozier@cisco.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 6:43 PM
To: xmlconf@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: how bad is soap?


Karl,

Snip

Is SOAP being suggested as an alternative to BEEP or to be contained 
within BEEP?

If BEEP is used, then don't see much value for the SOAP envelope or RPC
as 
they become redundant.

Snip

agreed


--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>