Especially since the device doesn't know the difference. ;-(
regards,
John
John Strassner
Chief Strategy Officer
Intelliden Corporation
90 South Cascade Avenue
Colorado Springs, CO 80903 USA
phone: +1.719.785.0648
FAX: +1.719.785.0644
email: john.strassner@intelliden.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Presuhn [mailto:randy_presuhn@mindspring.com]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 12:34 PM
To: xmlconf@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: netconf WG charter proposal
Hi -
> From: "Phil Shafer" <phil@juniper.net>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
> Cc: <xmlconf@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 10:40 AM
> Subject: Re: netconf WG charter proposal
>
> "Randy Presuhn" writes:
> >If the config/state distinction only shows up at the protocol level,
> >then we'll end up with the "device is configuration of record"
>
> Can you explain this a bit? I don't see one following the other.
If there is nothing in the information model or data model to tell a management application (or developer!) which bits are "configuration", the only way to find out is to ask the device. Not exactly a good omen for provisioning a network. :-)
Randy
--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>