[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-01.txt is now available
At 2/25/2003:11:29 AM, Andy Bierman wrote:
>At 05:12 PM 2/25/2003 +0100, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
>>> >3.) The SMICng include file in Appendix C may need to be updated;
>>> >the editor is awaiting further input.
>>> Why do we include any commercial products (as opposed
>>> to none or all)?
>>Valid question. Maybe we should not.
>I think the current text in the draft is fine.
> - It is in the appendix section
> - SMICng and smilint are both excellent tools for checking SMI conformance
> - SMICng and smilint are the most widely used tools for this purpose
> - the draft is providing practical guidelines on how to configure
> these programs to check a MIB so it will meet IETF expectations
> - If some people think an important SMI validation tool has been
> left out, I would rather see it added than the SMICng and smilint
> sections removed
While I have already stated my case (that argues against
Andy's first sentence above), I do agree with the last
bullet in his list.
>Perhaps the draft should make it more clear that SMI conformance is
>dictated by the standards documents, not any particular SMI conformance
That would be a very good idea.