[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inputting mixed SC/TC (Re: [idn] A question...)
Chinese culuture is so profound,no one can enumerate
all case, neither you nor me.
The U+53EA is one case of the 1:(n+1) simplifications.
It is simplified character.
All variants of U+53EA are include in GBK GB13000 GB18030
And U+7947 is a TongJiaZhi of U+53EA.
If you decide one character is simplified of traditional
depend on whether it is been included in BIG5 or GB, you
don't understand the TC/SC variant issue.
And yes, it's tiresome to keep deny a simple fact.
There are objecting argument, I respect it.
But, I'm not appreciate the way of deny fact.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth Whistler" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Mr. Deng,
> > Hi James,
> > Maybe you not realize that your following input Chinese string
> > is TC/SC mixed:
> > the simplified is "只显示BIG5字集"
> > <u+53ea u+663e u+793a u+0042 u+0049 u+0047 u+0035 u+5b57 u+96c6>
> > the traditional is "隻顯示BIG5字集"
> > <u+96bb u+986f u+793a u+0042 u+0049 u+0047 u+0035 u+5b57 u+96c6>
> > your input is "只顯示BIG5字集"
> > <u+53ea u+986f u+793a u+0042 u+0049 u+0047 u+0035 u+5b57 u+96c6>
> And perhaps *you* do not realize that U+53EA zhi3 is *also* a
> traditional character, and that it contrasts in proper usage
> with U+96BB zhi3, and that a normal *traditional* representation
> of zhi3xian4 "Only show..." would be U+53EA U+986F.
> U+53EA is also one of the 1-n simplifications that screw up the
> SC/TC mapping in any case. In PRC orthography, it is not only the
> simplification of U+96BB, but also the simplification for U+7947
> (and U+7957), which is the proper adverbial particle for "only, merely".
> > And, do you mean User will set a cofiguration to forbiden himself to use
> > his familiar character?
> U+53EA *is* in Big-5. 0xA575. Do your homework.
> This kind of intentionally misleading example and campaign of
> ad hominem argumentation directed at the chair is getting
> truly tiresome.