[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] NSI whitepaper on ML Resolution



Allow me to add one more to this thread...
it seems to me, being the author of the dnsii-trace draft that the proposed
NSI resolution schedule is very similar to that discussed in my draft with
david.  Which means that the discussion about the approach is not really out
of the scope of this wg.
I would really like to hear some comments on the TRACE-CNAME approach.

Edmon

----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc Blanchet" <Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca>
To: <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 2:37 PM
Subject: RE: [idn] NSI whitepaper on ML Resolution


> - ok guys, PLEASE stop this thread. this is specific to a particular
> vendor. Please use this vendor mailing list for your comments.
> - btw, the protocol design team suggestion is JUST a suggestion to the wg.
> This is in no way the current (as of wednesday 11h30 california time) wg
> direction. it is a suggestion to the wg. The wg can decide to reject,
> accept, change, etc.. And then the IETF/IESG can also say a word (or
> more...) to this. We have to follow the process here.
>
> Marc.
>
>
> At/À 13:37 2000-12-13 -0500, Hollenbeck, Scott you wrote/vous écriviez:
> >I agree with Rick that this discussion should be taken to the VeriSign
> >mlcentral mailing list, but the assertion of "not ACE" is incorrect.  If
a
> >client can send an ACE query, it will be resolved appropriately.
> >
> >The approach described in the paper is a _proposal_, hence the "draft"
> >markings (sorry if that's not clear in the paper itself).  Given the
design
> >team's presentation this week it obviously needs to be revisited.
> >
> >Scott Hollenbeck
> >VeriSign Global Registry Services
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Hideyo Imazu
> >To: idn@ops.ietf.org
> >Sent: 12/13/00 12:53 PM
> >Subject: Re: [idn] NSI whitepaper on ML Resolution
> >
> >At 00/12/11 16:30 -0800, Rick H Wesson wrote:
> > >see http://www.nsiregistry.com/multilingual/resolution.pdf
> >
> >According to the document, they plan to have name resolving library
> >query to DNS server in UTF-8, not ACE when a user enters an
> >internationalized domain name on a program.  This means DNS servers
> >should be UTF-8 aware to provide name resolution for internationalized
> >domain names.
> >
> >This doesn't look good and this goes a different direction from IDNA.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Hideyo Imazu.
>
>
> Marc Blanchet
> Viagénie inc.
> tel: 418-656-9254
> http://www.viagenie.qc.ca
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Normos (http://www.normos.org): Internet standards portal:
> IETF RFC, drafts, IANA, W3C, ATMForum, ISO, ... all in one place.
>