[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-lace-00.txt
- To: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Re: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-lace-00.txt
- From: Yoshiro YONEYA <yone@po.ntts.co.jp>
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 20:57:19 +0900 (JST)
- Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 03:58:03 -0800
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
Hi, all!
From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Subject: [idn] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-lace-00.txt
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 05:59:36 -0500
> Title : LACE: Length-based ASCII Compatible Encoding for IDN
> Author(s) : M. Davis, P. Hoffman
> Filename : draft-ietf-idn-lace-00.txt
> Pages : 20
> Date : 07-Nov-00
I wonder why LACE uses the same prefix as RACE. At a glance,
compression / uncompression algorithm of LACE is not compatible with
RACE. Would you please correct if I am wrong?
--
Yoshiro YONEYA <yone@po.ntts.co.jp>