Re: [idn] IDNRA comments

["Maynard Kang" <maynard@pobox.org.sg>]

> >A twist in the same argument but would make good sense too :-)
> >
> >Care to doc this down in an I-D? We need a transition doc.
>
> Frankly, I am hoping that someone will first solve item 6, like making
> quoted-printable have a usable "pretty" format.  I believe the benefit, in
> this case, would be enormous.
>
The problem is that QP/B64 is character encoding scheme for any arbitrary
character set hence it does not preserve the uniqueness of the domain name
(more than one possible representation of the same abstract characters)