Re: [idn] Canonicalization: [28] through [31]

[James Seng <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

Okay, I took for granted that we can do NFKC/NFD then case fold to do
canonicalization. 

Anyway, whats your suggestion on the rewording?

-James Seng

> Karlsson Kent - keka wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Seng [mailto:jseng@pobox.org.sg]
> ...
> 
> > Since we have consensus on canonicalization, I suggest that
> > the statement above to be rewritten as
> >
> > For canonicalization, the protocol MUST comform to Unicode
> > Technical Reference #21.
> 
> The huge problem with that suggestion is that Unicode
> Technical Report 21 does NOT define any kind of
> "canonicalization" at all.  It HINTS at the possibility
> of using one of the normalisation forms (which ARE defined,
> in UTR 15) together with "case folding", but UTR 21 does
> NOT define how to.
> 
>                 Kind regards
>                 /kent k