Re: [idn] idn charter

[James Seng <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

Dear all,

I agreed with Marc assessment. I suggest we move forward with the charter with
the modification from IESG. 

-James Seng

Marc Blanchet wrote:
>  - while not trying at all to push the agenda, I think we have a very
> good charter now, that had a concensus before, and the current
> modifications make more precision while not changing the whole idea of
> the wg.
>  - you've begun very good work on the req doc, but without a wg, any doc
> is not very useful.
>  - to have a wg formed asap, we can get final iesg approval at their
> next telechat which is very soon if I remember well, and is probably one
> of the last, if not the last one, in order to have the wg formed for the
> next ietf.
>  - so the final step for all of us is to agree on the charter and then
> move on to the technical work
>  - it is also possible in the future to change the charter, so it is not
> a fixed contract forever.
> 
> - Can we move on and agree on the charter?
> - to be sure to get the iesg approval at the next telechat, can we agree
> on it before the end of the week?
> 
> Marc.