[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: Eeek - .NU Domains using $B%h(J , $B%H(J , $B%J(J , $B%o(J, $B%`(J - And More

At 11:01 00/01/09 +0800, James Seng wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Martin J. Duerst wrote:

> > 'Why not?' is a valuable answer. I read it as 'Nice to have,
> > but not a requirement.' So if in the design phase, we run
> > into too many constraints, we may have to give up on this
> > one rather than on some more important ones.
> 
> This is true. Perhaps we should classified this requirement as "SHOULD"
> and not "MUST". This reminds me...anyone going to sit down and write out
> the first draft-draft?

I would rather make that a MAY then. Except for the western digit case,
and similar cases that may come up, which are clearly needed, I haven't
seen any claim for a need for mixing in the general case, and Harald
has pointed out that some cases of undesirable naming conflicts can
be avoided if we exclude the general case.


Regards,   Martin.


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, World Wide Web Consortium
#-#-#  mailto:duerst@w3.org   http://www.w3.org